A recent Fair Work Commission case involving an Italian chef, a direction to put pineapple on a pizza and an objection based on cultural grounds provides an interesting example of a much broader workplace issue: what happens when an employee refuses a management direction?
In Mr Davide Tamburella v The Trustee For La Costa Hospitality Unit Trust [2026] FWC 4264, the pineapple dispute was only one part of a broader employment matter. While the Commission was not ultimately required to determine whether the direction itself was lawful and reasonable, the circumstances provide a useful reminder for employers about how refusals to follow workplace directions should be approached.
What happened?
Mr Tamburella was employed as a chef at La Costa in Brisbane.
During a performance meeting in May 2026, his employer raised a number of concerns, including an occasion where Mr Tamburella had refused a direction to put pineapple on a pizza being prepared for a function.
Mr Tamburella confirmed that he was aware of the direction but had refused to follow it. He explained that, as an Italian, putting pineapple on pizza was offensive to his culture and that he did not believe he was required to follow a direction he considered culturally offensive.
It was also not the first time the issue had arisen. Mr Tamburella acknowledged that he had refused the same direction on three occasions over approximately four years.
The employment relationship involved other issues beyond the pineapple dispute, including concerns raised by the employer about Mr Tamburella's performance, conduct and communication.
Following the end of his employment, Mr Tamburella made a general protections dismissal application to the Fair Work Commission.
What did the Commission decide?
The Commission did not ultimately determine whether Mr Tamburella's refusal to put pineapple on the pizza justified disciplinary action or dismissal.
His general protections application had been lodged outside the statutory timeframe. The issue before Commissioner Hunt was therefore whether there were exceptional circumstances that justified allowing additional time for the application to be made.
The Commission determined that exceptional circumstances had not been established and dismissed the application.
This distinction is important. The case should not be interpreted as a Fair Work Commission ruling that an employee can, or cannot, refuse a direction because of a cultural objection.
However, the circumstances raise an interesting and practical question for employers.
When can an employee refuse a management direction?
Employees are generally expected to comply with the lawful and reasonable directions of their employer.
Whether a particular direction is reasonable will depend on the circumstances. A direction may need to be considered in the context of the employee's role, workplace policies, safety obligations, employment conditions and other relevant factors.
Where an employee raises a cultural, religious, health, safety or other concern as the reason for refusing a direction, the appropriate response is not necessarily to move immediately to disciplinary action.
The employer should first understand the nature of the objection and consider whether it affects the lawfulness or reasonableness of the direction.
Equally, an employee's personal disagreement with a direction does not automatically mean they are entitled to refuse it.
What should employers do when an employee refuses a direction?
Before treating a refusal as a disciplinary matter, employers should establish exactly what direction was given, whether it was clearly communicated and why the employee has refused to comply.
From there, consider whether the direction is lawful and reasonable in the circumstances and whether the employee has raised an issue that requires further consideration.
If the direction remains lawful and reasonable, the employee should be clearly advised of the expectation and the potential consequences of continuing to refuse it. Any subsequent disciplinary process should then be managed fairly and with the employee given an opportunity to respond.
As with many workplace issues, the surrounding circumstances matter.
The pineapple may have been the most memorable part of this particular case, but the broader lesson is a useful one: when an employee refuses a management direction, understand the reason for the refusal before deciding how to respond.
And whether pineapple belongs on pizza remains, for now, outside the Fair Work Commission's jurisdiction.
Mr Davide Tamburella v The Trustee For La Costa Hospitality Unit Trust [2026] FWC 4264
Need practical HR advice?
Sunday HR supports Australian businesses with employee relations, performance management, workplace investigations and day-to-day HR advice. Get in touch if you need support working through a workplace issue.